Wednesday 1 December 2010

Autumn colour

 
My third film through the Holga GTLR is more colour Kodak 400VC. The next film to get developed is the less saturated Kodak 400NC film, I’ll be interested to compare the results. The saturated colours of the VC film suited the late autumn hues of a tree in a park local to me – one of the few trees with some leaves left.


Memorial to Capt Scott (of the Antarctic) who sailed from Cardiff


Can’t quite believe I made the rookie mistake of including my shadow in a photo (non-intentionally), but of course there’s no live view with a Holga, you just point it at what you want to photograph and shoot. Still, I should have spotted it! The other rookie mistake I made was falling asleep whilst inserting the film and winding past the first exposure – duh!

Who's the muppet casting a shadow in my photo?

I seemed REALLY close to this tree when I took the photo?



Another dual exposure (deliberate, I haven’t done an accidental one YET). I thought I had tried my home made Splitzer, but that must have been on the B&W film in my Holga 120N, yet  to be developed.  Some of these shots also feature the (£8 on EBAY) Holga wide angled lens attachment. You can see the greater vignette and corner distortion on the shots using the wide attachment.

Double exposure


The final two images are of my parents dog, (Caesar)  they wanted some pictures of him, so he got Holgered.

Hail Caesar

Noble, if somewhat dim beast.

Which brings me to the main drawback in Holga photography, the expense of developing and printing/scanning 120 film. The cheapest I can find is £10 for developing and scans, or developing and prints. Still with a “prosumer” DSLR costing £1000, you can afford a fair few films for that price.

2 comments:

  1. Love these! It is an expensive hobby!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is - but the cost is spread out with film. My digital camera cost loads, but is cheap to run. The Holga's cost little, but have all the ongoing film/development costs.

    ReplyDelete